BSI syntax

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #3049

#3049

From: Bart Demoen
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 1988 22:20

11 lines
903 bytes

R. O'Keefe writes:

> Chris Moss's recent posting on the syntax part of the BSI Prolog SubStandard
> deserves a detailed response, which I intend to provide in the coming week.
> For the record, here's a brief response:
>         (1) about half of the programs I have ever written would not be
>             accepted by a BSI-compatible reader.

I hope the "detailed response" will not consist of excerpta from half of the
programs of R. O'Keefe, but I am afraid it will ...
But less egocentric comments on Chris Moss's recent posting, I am interested in.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1175@kulcs.kulcs.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!prlb2!kulcs!bimbart

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!prlb2!kulcs!bimbart
From: bimbart@kulcs.uucp (Bart Demoen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: BSI syntax
Message-ID: <1175@kulcs.kulcs.uucp>
Date: 7 Mar 88 22:20:51 GMT
Reply-To: bimbart@kulcs.UUCP (Bart Demoen)
Organization: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Dept. Computer Science
Lines: 11