Re: When to use Prolog?

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #3070

#3070

From: Richard A. O'Keefe
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 1988 00:47

6 lines
705 bytes

In article <759@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>, ok@quintus.UUCP I wrote:
> Using Prolog is like running up a slightly less steep hill.  Using a shell
> is like running along level ground until wham! you hit a brick wall.

I should have made it clear that I had in mind shells like EMYCIN,
not programming languages like M.1.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <765@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!sri-unix!quintus!ok

References: <382@dsacg1.UUCP> <759@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!sri-unix!quintus!ok
From: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: When to use Prolog?
Message-ID: <765@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Date: 12 Mar 88 00:47:02 GMT
References: <382@dsacg1.UUCP> <759@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
Lines: 6
Keywords: Prolog

Reply to Parent Message