🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #3500

prolog speeds

#3500
From: Hans Buurman
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 1988 13:30
16 lines
1022 bytes
We currently have Poplog on trial (on a sun 3/50). After having used it
for two days, I must say that it seems to be about twice as slow as
C-prolog, that I have also worked with on the same machine. Also,
debugging seems to have less options. This amazes me, as I saw somewhere
on the net that C-prolog isn't really thought of very highly when it
comes to speed.

Are my conclusions valid, or am I missing something ? Please reply
to: dutrun!duttnph!hans@mcvax.nl

Hans

Any opinions, wrong postings and other errors are my own. I do not
represent Delft University or Systems Designers and I don't live in
Edinburgh.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <311@dutrun.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!mcvax!dutrun!tnphhbu

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!mcvax!dutrun!tnphhbu
From: tnphhbu@dutrun.UUCP (Hans Buurman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: prolog speeds
Keywords: poplog, c-prolog
Message-ID: <311@dutrun.UUCP>
Date: 21 Jul 88 13:30:01 GMT
Organization: Delft University of Technology,The Netherlands
Lines: 16