🚀 go-pugleaf

ok, forgive me for being stupid. In UNH Prolog, I consult the following:

/* cuttest.pro ... learning about the behaviour
   of the database and cuts.
*/

foo(1).
foo(2).
foo(3).

foobar(X,Y) :- foo(X),!,foo(Y).

	Then the query 

		?- foobar(X,Y).

	returns four answers;  (3,3) (3,1) (3,2) and (3,3)
in that order.

On the other hand, the file:

/* cuttest2.pro ... learning about the behaviour
   of the database and cuts.
*/

goobar(X,Y) :- goo(X),!,goo(Y).

goo(1).
goo(2).
goo(3).

	behaves as I expected the first one to do, returning three
answers: (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) to the query

	?- goobar(X,Y).

	Is UNH Prolog broken or am I?


{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
{}									  {}
{} jax@well	." Sysop, Realtime Control and Forth Board"		  {}
{} jax@chariot  ." (303) 278-0364 300/1200 8-n-1 24 hrs."                 {}
{} JAX on GEnie		." Tell them JAX sent you!"			  {}
{}									  {}
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}