🚀 go-pugleaf

Yasusi Kanada has inquired about other references to forward-chaining
productions systems in Prolog.

As noted in earlier articles, backward-chaining systems are very
straight-forward in Prolog.  Forward-chaining systems, while not
quite as directly implementable, are nevertheless fairly easy to
write in Prolog.  As part of my doctoral work, I wrote a forward-
chaining system on top of SICTStus Prolog.  A complete listing of
the system is available as an appendix in Novick, D. G. 1988. "Control
of mixed-initiative discourse through meta-locutionary acts: A
computational model,"  Tech. Rep. CIS-TR-88-18, Department of Computer
and Information Science, University of Oregon.  This work relied on 
my earlier Lisp-based contributions to the ORBS system.

Some of the nice feature of writing a rule-based system in
Prolog are that (1) conflict resolution can be described in predicate
form, so CR strategies can be domain-customized rather easily, 
(2) most of the unification chores are handled by the language, (3) it
is trivial to add control information to rules, and (4) there is a
good correspondence between "test" clauses in a rule and the idea that
something is provable.

==============================================================================
David G. Novick			  |  internet: novick@cs.uoregon.edu
Computer and Information Science  |  uucp:     {tek|hp-pcd}!uoregon!fog!novick
University of Oregon		  |  home:     (503) 687-9506
Eugene, Oregon  97403-1202	  |  office:   (503) 686-4408
==============================================================================