Re: Comparing Prolog with other languag

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #3931

#3931

From: kale
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 1989 14:53

6 lines
782 bytes

Carl: Regarding the speedup you obtained for the Prolog version
of the propositional theorem prover:
Was the speedup due to the native code compilation alone?
If not, what role did the profiler (performance analyzer) play, and
what sort of source to sorce changes you made in the program?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5500011@m.cs.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!kale

References: <28091@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!kale
From: kale@m.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Comparing Prolog with other languag
Message-ID: <5500011@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 89 14:53:00 GMT
References: <28091@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Lines: 6
Nf-ID: #R:ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU:28091:m.cs.uiuc.edu:5500011:000:289
Nf-From: m.cs.uiuc.edu!kale    Mar  1 08:53:00 1989

Reply to Parent Message