Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #4125Re: More fun with WG17
From: Jeff Dalton
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1989 19:16
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1989 19:16
8 lines
998 bytes
998 bytes
In article <1359@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> cdsm@doc.ic.ac.uk (Chris Moss) writes: >Thus the portmanteau approach of Common Lisp would have been a more >appropriate model than "do it the Edinburgh way". You still seem to think Common Lisp solved all conflicts about how to do X by including all ways to do X. That is simply not true. Common Lisp is closer to "do it the MIT way" than you seem to think.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1494@skye.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeffReferences:
<2609@munnari.oz.au> <696@sce.carleton.ca> <2643@munnari.oz.au> <1355@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <2717@munnari.oz.au> <1359@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: More fun with WG17 Message-ID: <1494@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 26 Dec 89 19:16:06 GMT References: <2609@munnari.oz.au> <696@sce.carleton.ca> <2643@munnari.oz.au> <1355@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <2717@munnari.oz.au> <1359@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton) Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 8