Re: incrementing values

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #4154

#4154

From: Gary Murphy
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1990 03:37

16 lines
1432 bytes

Looking at the original question, I'm reminded of why we've continued to
develop new programming languages.  A 'mangle' like x +=1 has nothing to
do with prolog: is 7 now equivalent to 6?  Rolling the digits on the
register object is best left to the object-oriented extensions, and I
for one would rather the compiler accepted a more logical x' = x + 1 and
spat out a terser INC AX!  Ours is not to wonder how ...

Gary Murphy                   uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!garym
                              (garym%cognos.uucp@uunet.uu.net)
(613) 738-1338 x5537          Cognos Inc. P.O. Box 9707 Ottawa K1G 3N3
"There are many things which do not concern the process" - Joan of Arc
-- 
Gary Murphy                   uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!garym
                              (garym%cognos.uucp@uunet.uu.net)
(613) 738-1338 x5537          Cognos Inc. P.O. Box 9707 Ottawa K1G 3N3
"There are many things which do not concern the process" - Joan of Arc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7926@cognos.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!sce!cognos!garym

References: <17467@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> <31462@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <34699@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <17483@megaron.cs.arizona.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!sce!cognos!garym
From: garym@cognos.UUCP (Gary Murphy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: incrementing values
Keywords: optimization, mangle
Message-ID: <7926@cognos.UUCP>
Date: 5 Feb 90 03:37:26 GMT
References: <17467@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> <31462@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <34699@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <17483@megaron.cs.arizona.edu>
Reply-To: garym@cognos.UUCP (Gary Murphy)
Organization: Cognos Inc., Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message