Re: Turbo Prolog Versions

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #4197

#4197

From: Chris Moss
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 20:31

16 lines
1196 bytes

In article <1763@skye.ed.ac.uk> timd@aiai.uucp (Tim Duncan) writes:
>I see nothing there to suggest that the system was "ripped off", in fact the
>phrase "buy the whole system again" implies that it was legitimately purchased
>(which it was).

I apologize Tim and John. I misread the line

>> However, the application's README file says it requires a file called 
>> PROLOG.OVL from the Prolog diskette. 

as being the Turbo README file, which would imply the Turbo disk was
incomplete. I withdraw the comment utterly.

It strikes me that it's the application that's probably out of date. MS-DOS
hasn't used .OVL files for years has it?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1601@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!sappho!cdsm

References: <1641@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1021@trlluna.trl.oz> <1592@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <1763@skye.ed.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!sappho!cdsm
From: cdsm@sappho.doc.ic.ac.uk (Chris Moss)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Turbo Prolog Versions
Message-ID: <1601@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 15 Feb 90 20:31:15 GMT
References: <1641@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1021@trlluna.trl.oz> <1592@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <1763@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: news@doc.ic.ac.uk
Reply-To: cdsm@doc.ic.ac.uk (Chris Moss)
Organization: Logic Group, Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message