🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #705

Turbo Prolog is not Prolog (was Re: Commercial Prolog)

#705
From: Serge Le Huitouze
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 08:00
22 lines
1362 bytes
In article <1992Sep10.032600.8565@athena.cs.uga.edu>, mcovingt@athena.cs.uga.edu
(Michael A. Covington) writes:
|> PDC Prolog (formerly Turbo Prolog) is not Prolog; it is a different
|> Prolog-like language, with strong typing rather than Prolog's typeless
|> approach to variables.

I certainly agree with M. Covington that Turbo Prolog is not Prolog.

However, I don't think this is because TP has "strong typing".

Other logic programming languages DO have types.
As an example, lambda-Prolog is a typed language: the unification of lambda-terms,
upon which lambda-Prolog is based, is only practicable (in fact semi-decidable)
on TYPED lambda-terms.
However, lambda-Prolog shares many features with Prolog and can be considered as a
"brother" of Prolog.


The difference between Turbo Prolog and standard Prolog must be elsewhere.

I think people more familiar with Turbo Prolog than myself could enlighten
this point.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.080007.27406@irisa.fr>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!corton!irisa!irisa.fr!serge
References: <1992Sep10.032600.8565@athena.cs.uga.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!corton!irisa!irisa.fr!serge
From: serge@irisa.fr (Serge Le Huitouze)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Turbo Prolog is not Prolog (was Re: Commercial Prolog)
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.080007.27406@irisa.fr>
Date: 11 Sep 92 08:00:07 GMT
References: <1992Sep10.032600.8565@athena.cs.uga.edu>
Sender: news@irisa.fr
Reply-To: serge@irisa.fr
Organization: Irisa, Rennes(FR)
Lines: 22