Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #77Re: Do i *need* a 387 for
From: Marc "VELZ" van Velzen
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 13:37
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 13:37
60 lines
2864 bytes
2864 bytes
In comp.lang.prolog Cyberman writes: >Fortunately the 386 has a built in emulation call. Thier are >several 87 and 387 emulators for this very reason. So in order >for this to work you must find yourself an emulator. I could >UUcode you one if that would help. I sorta solved the problem by probing the archive I got the prolog from, as with most of these problems: the answer was in the manual. I thought I cancelled the article in time, but unfortunately, you can't depend on InterNet slowness like you used too :-). > M"VV> Can I convince go32 to do it's math on the 386 and not to bother with > M"VV> the 387? If not, can I get another program to emmulate the 387? Should > M"VV> I recompile the whole thing telling gcc not to bother with the 387? > M"VV> (that would realy tick me off) If so where on ftp can I find gcc for > M"VV> _DOS_ (not linux or anything)? >Hmm you have source how big is it? Yep, the whole thing is copylefted, so the source is freely available, it's pretty big though, the compressed archive adds up to about 900 Kb, and besides, re-compiling things is not my idea of a fun time (things always turn up, I get really agrivated when I try something like that). > M"VV> I *realy* need swiprolog, it's great, and I'm used to it (un*x > M"VV> version). So if anyone has any ideas *please* help me out. >1: don't panic I did, sorry 'bout that. >2: take a deep breath and think rationally. >3: ask Archie where to find what you need. What's Archie? I usualy perform Human-Directory-Tree-Traversal to find what I need. >my suggestion is to look for an emulator for the 387 or 87. >These exist and meanwhile I'll grab one and UUCode it to you in >case you DON'T find one :) I'd still like that, an all purpose emulator would probably come in very handy one day. > M"VV> Maybe this is a FAQ or just a SQ (stupid question), but I'm relatively > M"VV> new to dos machines, and my local guru is on vacation (just my luck). >Dos machine don't bite the most important thing is THINK. Scary >but true. The question is neither stupid nor is it a FAQ! Regards, *marc* -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc van Velzen, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, HOLLAND Email: mvelzen@fwi.uva.nl --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug10.133707.7577@fwi.uva.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!fwi.uva.nl!gene.fwi.uva.nl!mvelzenReferences:
<gate.w389oB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!fwi.uva.nl!gene.fwi.uva.nl!mvelzen From: mvelzen@fwi.uva.nl (Marc "VELZ" van Velzen) Subject: Re: Do i *need* a 387 for Message-ID: <1992Aug10.133707.7577@fwi.uva.nl> Sender: news@fwi.uva.nl Nntp-Posting-Host: gene.fwi.uva.nl Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam References: <gate.w389oB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 13:37:07 GMT Lines: 60