Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #893Re: Proof that Prolog can be faster than C
From: Kevin D. Quitt
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 1990 22:31
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 1990 22:31
37 lines
1737 bytes
1737 bytes
In article <47658@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> jwmills@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Jonathan Mills) writes:
>but does list some other interesting results for TAK:
>
>IMPLEMENTATION CPU RAW TIME (sec)
>-------------- --------- --------------
>Portable Standard Lisp Cray-1 0.044
>Symbolics 3600+IFU 0.43
>Assembler 68000 0.7
>Franz Lisp VAX 780 1.09
>Common Lisp VAX 785 1.18
>Portable Standard Lisp Sun/2 (68010) 1.44
>Common Lisp VAX 780 1.83
>C 68000 1.9
>Franz Lisp 68000 2.37
>INTERLISP Dolphin 11.12
>
Just for fun, on a Motorola Delta 3608 (25MHz 68030),
cc: gnucc:
0.6 0.15 cc tak.c
0.3 0.3 cc -O tak.c
and on a TwinHead 386/25, Microsoft C 6.0
0.28 /Ox /Gs
0.22 /Ox /Gsr
--
_
Kevin D. Quitt demott!kdq kdq@demott.com
DeMott Electronics Co. 14707 Keswick St. Van Nuys, CA 91405-1266
VOICE (818) 988-4975 FAX (818) 997-1190 MODEM (818) 997-4496 PEP last
96.37% of all statistics are made up.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<302@demott.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!srhqla!demott!kdqReferences:
<47658@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!srhqla!demott!kdq From: kdq@demott.COM (Kevin D. Quitt) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Proof that Prolog can be faster than C Keywords: TAK, benchmarking Message-ID: <302@demott.COM> Date: 14 Jun 90 22:31:57 GMT References: <47658@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Reply-To: kdq@demott.COM (Kevin D. Quitt) Followup-To: comp.lang.prolog Organization: DeMott Electronics Co., Van Nuys CA Lines: 37