Prolog III

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #955

#955

From: Daniel Mark Gessel
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 1990 19:02

18 lines
894 bytes

There's a specification of Prolog III in the latest issue of Communications
of the ACM.

My experience suggests that if I write an Implementation of it, I'm free to
do what I want with it (i.e. sell it), But I don't know this for a fact.

Does anyone?

(This may have belonged on some other newsgroup, but I figured people here
may be thinking the same thing).

Thanks in advance,

Dan

--
Internet: gessel@cs.swarthmore.edu         
UUCP: {bpa,cbmvax}!swatsun!gessel

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4L0L3Q1@xavier.swarthmore.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!dino!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!xavier!gessel

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!dino!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!xavier!gessel
From: gessel@cs.swarthmore.edu (Daniel Mark Gessel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Prolog III
Summary: Any problems?
Keywords: Legalities
Message-ID: <4L0L3Q1@xavier.swarthmore.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 90 19:02:35 GMT
Sender: news@xavier.swarthmore.edu (Usenet News)
Organization: Swarthmore College, PA, USA
Lines: 18