Article View: comp.lang.scheme.c
Article #12Re: C, but with lisp syntax
From: Dave Saunders
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:48
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:48
27 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
>Imagine ANSI C, but with lisp syntax and lisp macros.
>I.e. a lisp dialect that translates directly to C and
>needs no implicit runtime library. Sort of like the
>ratfor idea, but lisp->c instead of c->fortran.
>
>If I have to program in C because my program has to run
>on several architectures and it has to be really small
>and fast, at least I could have decent syntax and macros.
>Now add some sugar to this, like cond which returns a
>value instead of switch which doesn't, etc. ...
>
>Anyone have such a thing?
>
> --dave yost
Sounds like you want lisp syntax
- it doesn't have any (that's the beauty of it) -
and C data structures and memory management
- it doesn't have any (thats why you can get small and fast) -
so to have both is easy. In lisp syntax, it's
()
My appologies in advance for this flip remark, please minimize the return
flames.
-dave saunders
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9204152048.AA02915@algol.math.udel.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!gatech!bloom-beacon!INTERNET!dont-send-mail-to-path-linesReferences:
<1992Apr14.181631.180@adobe.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme.c Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!gatech!bloom-beacon!INTERNET!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines From: saunders@math.udel.EDU (Dave Saunders) Subject: Re: C, but with lisp syntax Message-ID: <9204152048.AA02915@algol.math.udel.EDU> Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: The Internet References: <1992Apr14.181631.180@adobe.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:48:53 GMT Lines: 28