Article View: comp.lang.scheme.c
Article #202macro question
From: Kardan Kaveh
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:10
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:10
40 lines
1737 bytes
1737 bytes
In an effort to have my macro definitions exist in all my source files,
I have placed the following code in my init file:
(define-macro (define-macro-both pattern . body)
`(begin
(define-macro ,pattern ,@body)
(syntax-table-define system-global-syntax-table ',(car pattern)
(macro ,(cdr pattern)
,@body))))
(syntax-table-define user-initial-syntax-table 'define-macro-both
(macro (pattern . body)
`(begin
(define-macro ,pattern ,@body)
(syntax-table-define system-global-syntax-table ',(car pattern)
(macro ,(cdr pattern)
,@body)))))
(set! syntaxer/default-environment user-initial-environment)
The first two forms are from the macros.txt documentation file.
These have the desired effect when the code is interpreted, but when I compile
a file containing a macro which refers to a function defined in the same file,
or a file refering to a macro defined elsewhere, the interpreter complains
about unbound variables.
What do I need to do to make macros behave, in compiled code, the same
as in interpreted code?
Thanks,
Kaveh
--
------------
Kaveh Kardan kaveh@taarna.UUCP
Systeme Taarna kardank@eole.umontreal.qc.ca
Montreal Quebec Canada (514)844-8448
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan24.051036.22605@cc.umontreal.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!sifon!CC.UMontreal.CA!kardankShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!sifon!CC.UMontreal.CA!kardank From: kardank@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Kardan Kaveh) Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme.c Subject: macro question Message-ID: <1993Jan24.051036.22605@cc.umontreal.ca> Date: 24 Jan 93 05:10:36 GMT Sender: news@cc.umontreal.ca (Administration de Cnews) Organization: Universite de Montreal Lines: 40