wait statement in procedures

Article View: comp.lang.vhdl

Article #307

#307

From: Fred Rose
Date: Fri, 10 May 1991 14:07

18 lines
1302 bytes

This is a question for you tool builders out there.

I am building a model where it will be very nice to have procedures with wait
statements in them. While that is certainly legal, I am concerned about
performance. I recall a year or so ago at VUG that, someone from HHB stated
that was a very bad idea from a performance standpoint. Any clues or
suggestions as to how big a hit that it would be? I know the best way to check
is to benchmark it myself, but I'd thought I'd check the net first.

Thanks!

---------------------------------------------------------
Fred Rose                            
Honeywell Systems and Research Center
MS-2100                    e-mail: rose@src.honeywell.com            
3660 Technology Dr.        Phone : (612) 782-7106
Minneapolis, MN 55418      Fax   : (612) 782-7438

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991May10.140716.10481@src.honeywell.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!smaug!rose

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.vhdl
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!smaug!rose
From: rose@SRC.Honeywell.COM (Fred Rose)
Subject: wait statement in procedures
Message-ID: <1991May10.140716.10481@src.honeywell.com>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.com (News interface)
Nntp-Posting-Host: smaug.src.honeywell.com
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Fri, 10 May 91 14:07:16 GMT