🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <8904211724.AA08448@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu>, by gld@CUNIXD.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Gary L Dare):
> Would readers care to share their opinions on some of the CAD tools
> offered (or once offered) by universities?  The obvious ones that come
> to mind are:
> 
> 1. Magic
> 2. Vivid
> 3. Caesar
> 
> All three of these are in wide use, but their development has been
> discontinued.
> 
> Also, there is a new program from Berkeley called OCT; does anyone
> have any experience with it that they'd care to share?
> 
> gld
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Gary L. Dare				> gld@eevlsi.ee.columbia.EDU
> 					> gld@cunixd.cc.columbia.EDU 	
> 	"SLAINTE MHATH!"		> gld@cunixc.BITNET

Hi --

   This would not be considered to be a followup of the article but 
I just thought that it would be closest to what I had to ask.
Is there anyone out there who is using the Seattle Silicon Compilers
as their CAD tools? I am using them and am having quite a few problems
with them. I would like to know if any of these problems are universal
or if they are due to the environment which I am working in. We typically
have about a 100 workstations that can use them simultaneously and I 
keep getting errors of "unable to open file XXXX" etc. 
   Please mail me over this net so that, I expect, others will also have
the opportunity to have a look at what problems the new generation compilers
are facing.

Shailendra
------- :)
(ssave@caen.engin.umich.edu)