Article View: comp.lsi
Article #292Re: no PALASM90 on workstations
From: Rick Spanbauer
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 1990 16:13
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 1990 16:13
45 lines
2858 bytes
2858 bytes
In article <1990Aug5.070528.4522@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:
Gee, Phil, usually you can be counted on for rational postings ;-) ;-)
>PALASM90 for Suns? Which Suns? Sun-3? Sun-386i? Sparc? Which OS of
>the week? (when we upgraded the OS, it broke "less".) Which window
>system? Suntools? Sunview? X? News? Now take all these choices and
>multiply them together. Sun-3 with X. Sun-3 with News. Sun-3 with
>Sunview. Sparc with X. Sparc with News. Sparc with Sunview. etc.
^^^^ NeWS; palasm under rn would be fun :-)
Let's try this: you've (AMD) focused on a particular instance
of PC technology, ie PC running MS-DOS, presumably going directly
to the screen (ega/vga?). You could have chosen MS-DOS + Windows/3.0,
MS-DOS + Desqview/X, or run under OS/2, QNX, etc. Let's remap
AMD's PC or die decision into a similar cutset of Sun technology: port
your tools to Sparc, running Sunview initially. Just as your PC stuff
may eventually have to be moved on top of Windows 3.0, you may have
to move from Sunview to OpenLook. The truth of software, and I assume
you know this, is that it always entails ongoing investment in
maintenance, support, and upgrades. If you guys can't figure this
out, I would be happy to do it for you for some AMD con$ulting
dollars :-) After all, if Lotus Corp was able to make their peace
with Suns, AMD should too... FYI, companies with much less
development bucks than Lotus & AMD are porting from PC -> Sparc,
eg P-CAD, CUPL, Pads-PCB, etc.
>I suggest you buy a nice cheap and fast PC, get PC-NFS for networking
>and MKS toolkit to make the command set somewhat like Unix. You
>might even find you have a nice word processor in the bargain.
Sorry, but this is becoming less of an option for many of us in
hardware land. My machine of choice for any engineering task is the
sparcstation - if your tools don't run there, I will not buy them.
>Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com
Rick Spanbauer
Ameristar
PS. We do, or at least used to do, a lot of business with AMD (for pals, and
lance enet stuff) - so consider this message as constructive criticism
from a customer. Observe too that a smallish company named "Sun" uses
quite a lot of your stuff in their workstations, notably the
sparcstation.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug5.161336.18508@ameristar>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!sbcs!ameristar!rickReferences:
<833@hls0.hls.oz> <1990Aug5.070528.4522@amd.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!sbcs!ameristar!rick From: rick@ameristar (Rick Spanbauer) Newsgroups: comp.lsi,comp.lsi.cad,sci.electronics Subject: Re: no PALASM90 on workstations Keywords: PAL PALASM AMD Message-ID: <1990Aug5.161336.18508@ameristar> Date: 5 Aug 90 16:13:36 GMT References: <833@hls0.hls.oz> <1990Aug5.070528.4522@amd.com> Organization: Ameristar Technology, Inc Lines: 45