SPICE 2g6

Article View: comp.lsi

Article #932

#932

From: Larry McMurchie
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1987 17:10

21 lines
1097 bytes


I still believe that the formula appearing in the code originally 
distributed by Berkeley is correct:

  200 FACTOR=0.125D0*FNARRW*TWOPI*EPSSIL/COX*XL

....and that we goofed when we tried to modify it. 

The key here is that COX already has an XL and an XW factored into it!
(see SUBROUTINE MOSFET).  In order to leave just an XW in the
denominator,  an XL is required in the numerator,  which is exactly
what appears in the formula.

If I am overlooking something here,  let me know.




						Larry McMurchie
						Univ. of Washington

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8711091710.AA02296@vlsi.cs.washington.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!VLSI.CS.WASHINGTON.EDU!larry

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!VLSI.CS.WASHINGTON.EDU!larry
From: larry@VLSI.CS.WASHINGTON.EDU (Larry McMurchie)
Newsgroups: comp.lsi
Subject: SPICE 2g6
Message-ID: <8711091710.AA02296@vlsi.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 9-Nov-87 12:10:24 EST
Article-I.D.: vlsi.8711091710.AA02296
Posted: Mon Nov  9 12:10:24 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Nov-87 19:53:22 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21