🚀 go-pugleaf

>>>>> On 3 Jan 1993 18:36:46 -0500, vincent@cad.gatech.edu (Vincent Fox) said:
V> NNTP-Posting-Host: cae.cad.gatech.edu

V> In <1i7sfrINN3n4@cae.cad.gatech.edu> vincent@cad.gatech.edu (Vincent Fox) writes:
>In <rhoward.726024194@matd> rhoward@matd.gatech.edu (Robert L. Howard) writes:
>>>vincent@cad.gatech.edu (Vincent Fox) writes:

[stuff deleted]

>Hmmmm. I did apply a pile of patches to my 4.1.2, one of which was 100075-08,
>which claims to fix all the evils of rpc.lockd. Perhaps it is actually
>causing the problem in this case. I will revert to the old copy and see
>what that does.

V> Yep, I reverted to rpc.lockd.FCS on the clients and no problems. I'm not
V> sure this is such a great idea though since there were so many things
V> wrong with the original lockd. Oh well, maybe Sun actually has *another*
V> fix by now. I'm still running the revised rpc.lockd on the server and
V> it all seems to work okay. Strange......

You may want to get the later version of the lockd patch, the latest
version that I know of is 100075-09.  Also take note that not all -08
versions of the patch were created equal, there were two versions on
the -08 version of the patch, one works the other does not :-(



--
Brett Lymn