Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #1207Re: Return-Receipt-To: header reliable?
From: Leslie Mikesell
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:59
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:59
15 lines
1110 bytes
1110 bytes
In article <1992Sep10.080432.12737@Veritas.COM> tron@Veritas.COM (Ronald S. Karr) writes: >> >>smail also supports Return-Receipt-To: headers. > >Which smail? Smail2.5 didn't, last I checked. The official releases >of smail3.1 don't, although I believe that some unofficial patches are >filtering around that do this. Smail3 doesn't need any patches to the executable for this. All you have to do is add a transport entry that pipes to a shell script or program that generates the receipts if requested, then add it as a shadow transport to local delivery. Les Mikesell les@chinet.chi.il.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BuF5n6.KJB@chinet.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!machine!chinet!lesReferences:
<1992Sep05.124731.8552@golem.uucp> <Bu9B21.J2G@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> <1992Sep10.080432.12737@Veritas.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.headers Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!machine!chinet!les From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Subject: Re: Return-Receipt-To: header reliable? Message-ID: <BuF5n6.KJB@chinet.chi.il.us> Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX References: <1992Sep05.124731.8552@golem.uucp> <Bu9B21.J2G@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> <1992Sep10.080432.12737@Veritas.COM> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:59:29 GMT Lines: 15