Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #1238AT&T's PMX mailer vs. domains
From: Leslie Mikesell
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 14:34
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 14:34
9 lines
865 bytes
865 bytes
Does anyone have AT&T's PMX-mail products co-existing with RFC822 style addressing? If so, how did you do it? Can smail/sendmail etc., deal with the Content-Type: and Content-Length: headers and the possible binary content of messages? Has anyone added automatic encoding of the binary portions for transport through hosts that can't handle it? Les Mikesell les@chinet.chi.il.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Apr10.143413.3763@chinet.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!dali!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!gargoyle!chinet!lesShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!dali!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!gargoyle!chinet!les From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: AT&T's PMX mailer vs. domains Message-ID: <1990Apr10.143413.3763@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 10 Apr 90 14:34:13 GMT Reply-To: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX Lines: 9