Re: Smail 3.1 configurations comments

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #1429

#1429

From: Cyro Lord
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 1990 18:39

9 lines
834 bytes

What I don't understand is why none of this program made it to Colorado.
I haven't seen either Smail3.0 or Smail 3.1..... I heard they would be
coming some time ago, have been looking for this, and received nothing.
-Cyro
-- 

Cyro Lord	Alpha Comm. Dev. Corp. -  DOMAIN  cyrill@scicom.alphacdc.com
UUCP		{ncar,nbires,boulder,isis}!scicom!cyrill
Endeavor to Persevere - Chief Dan George

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5533@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!isis!scicom!cyrill

References: <1990Jul11.175732.7383@fang.att.com> <582@dptspd.sat.datapoint.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!isis!scicom!cyrill
From: cyrill@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM (Cyro Lord)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Smail 3.1 configurations comments
Message-ID: <5533@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM>
Date: 20 Jul 90 18:39:15 GMT
References: <1990Jul11.175732.7383@fang.att.com> <582@dptspd.sat.datapoint.com>
Organization: Alpha Communications Development Corp., Aurora, CO.
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message