Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #1544Re: Regarding earlier post on smail3.x and alias problems.
From: Leslie Mikesell
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 1990 16:33
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 1990 16:33
19 lines
1354 bytes
1354 bytes
In article <219@dynasys.UUCP> jessea@dynasys.UUCP (Jesse W. Asher) writes: >I recently posted a message about having problems with aliases not >seeming to work. I recompiled smail using lsearch instead of bsearch >and that seems to ha >ve taken care of the problem. I don't know why, >but it seems to working ok now. Just thought some of you might be >interested. I must have missed the original post, but I suspect the problem is that if you specify the bsearch method, the "newaliases" script wants to produce the sorted list in a file called aliases.sort, but you may still be trying to search the file named "aliases". If your alias file is not large, it may not be worth changing back anyway. In general, the way to see what is going on with smail 3 is to use something like "smail -v200 -N address" and note the step that fails where you expect it to succeed. Les Mikesell les@chinet.chi.il.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug10.163315.8409@chinet.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!chinet!lesReferences:
<219@dynasys.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!chinet!les From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Regarding earlier post on smail3.x and alias problems. Message-ID: <1990Aug10.163315.8409@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 10 Aug 90 16:33:15 GMT References: <219@dynasys.UUCP> Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX Lines: 19