Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2049Re: Smail 2.5 and SCO Unix 3.2.2
From: Tim Endres
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 1990 12:01
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 1990 12:01
18 lines
1169 bytes
1169 bytes
In article <1990Dec04.130145.11290@usaos.uucp>, calhoun@usaos.uucp (Warren D. Calhoun) writes: > Or, just go with smail3. It has numerous advantages over smail2.5 (it's a > completely different animal), and compiles on SCO Unix 3.2.[012] MUCH easier > than mmdf. Combine this with something like ELM 2.3 and you have a powerful > setup. > I agree. My mail feed just recently switched to smail3 and it appears to work *much* better than sendmail! tim. ------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Endres | time@ice.com ICE Engineering | uunet!ice.com!time 8840 Main Street | Whitmore Lake MI. 48189 | (313) 449 8288
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1CE00001.e5c4ky@tbomb.ice.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ox.com!tbomb.ice.com!timeShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ox.com!tbomb.ice.com!time From: time@tbomb.ice.com (Tim Endres) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.xenix.sco Subject: Re: Smail 2.5 and SCO Unix 3.2.2 Message-ID: <1CE00001.e5c4ky@tbomb.ice.com> Date: 5 Dec 90 12:01:05 GMT Reply-To: time@tbomb.ice.com Organization: ICE Engineering, Inc. Lines: 17 X-Mailer: uAccess - Mac Release: 1.0.3