Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2073Re: X400 address conversion
From: nauen
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:56
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:56
50 lines
2661 bytes
2661 bytes
In <1992Sep24.194252.583@vms.huji.ac.il> backon@vms.huji.ac.il (Josh) writes:
> In article <1992Sep23.192658.285@cs.hw.ac.uk>, vibama@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott
> Doan) writes:
>
>> Help to translate the following Internet email address
>>
>> scv-request@media.mit.edu
>>
>> into X400 format will be greatly appreciated (Please reply via
>> private email. Thanks in advance. )
>>
>> The MHS-RELAY O/R Address Conversion Service at orac.mhs-relay.ac.uk
>> had converted the above address into X400 format as below:
>>
>> /RFC-822=scv-request(a)media.mit.edu/O=mhs-relay/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/
>>
>> but unfortunately, it doesn't work.
>
> Send email to: address-server@relay.cdnnet.ca with the word HELP in the
> body of the message to get info on their X400 address converter.
I think these automated address convertors have a ways to go before they're
generally helpful. Sending the address in question to
address-server@relay.cdnnet.ca results in
Date: 28 Sep 92 10:16 -0700
From: CDNnet Address Server <address-server@cdnnet.ca>
To: nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil
Message-Id: <mv920928101621>
RFC 822: scv-request@media.mit.edu
X.400: C=ca;ADMD=telecom.canada;PRMD=cdn;O=edu;OU=mit;OU=media;S=scv-request
This _might_ work from Telecom Canada; I doubt that it would be of much value
to an X.400 customer/user in the US, UK, or other countries. Unfortunately,
I can't see any evidence of uniformity in X.400 addresses. At this time,
I know of two which should work for the address scv-request@media.mit.edu
Sprint: (A:TELEMAIL,P:INTERNET,C:US,"RFC-822":<scv-request(a)media.mit.edu>)
AT&T: c=us;admd=attmail;o=uucp;dda.id=internet(b)media.mit.edu(b)scv-request
But neither may work from the UK. If I were in Scott's situation, needing
an X.400 address which would supposedly work from some system in England,
and mhs-relay gave me any answer which did _not_ work, I think I'd try to
find some live person at mhs-relay who might know more than the machine does.
Ric <nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil> <nauen%wrmain.decnet@detrick-emh1.army.mil>
^^^^^Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9209281809.AA03588@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL!nauenShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL!nauen From: nauen@WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: X400 address conversion Message-ID: <9209281809.AA03588@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 28 Sep 92 18:56:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 51