Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2113Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email.
From: Brad Templeton
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 08:40
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 08:40
20 lines
1499 bytes
1499 bytes
Talk about over-reaction. I am quite certain that the number of annoyed replies and bad publicity they got will be more than enough to educate and punish them for sending this mail. Fact is that most people would have already known it would attain this negative result, so it really doesn't matter what sort of punishment is meted out. Only people unaware of the punishment would do such a blind mailing, so deterrent is not possible. Myself, I am 100% in favour of electronic junk mail replacing the vast gobs of dead trees that land in my physical mailbox every day. Once we lay down the patterns so that proper headers are placed on the junk mail, then it's far better. My computer can screen my junk mail before I see it, something that doesn't happen on paper. For more details on this argument, please see comp.org.eff.talk where I posted before this thread began here. And calm down on this one. -- Brad Templeton, ClariNet Communications Corp. -- Sunnyvale, CA 408/296-0366
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct05.084013.24430@clarinet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!looking!bradReferences:
<cro.718060294@ennews!socrates.ed.asu.edu> <1992Oct3.010042.15366@fwi.uva.nl> <1992Oct4.231717.11307@cs.aukuni.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,news.admin.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!looking!brad From: brad@clarinet.com (Brad Templeton) Subject: Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email. Organization: ClariNet Communications Corp. Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 08:40:13 GMT Message-ID: <1992Oct05.084013.24430@clarinet.com> Keywords: question legal use email References: <cro.718060294@ennews!socrates.ed.asu.edu> <1992Oct3.010042.15366@fwi.uva.nl> <1992Oct4.231717.11307@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> Lines: 20