Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email.

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #2246

#2246

From: Alan P Barrett
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 11:19

15 lines
1241 bytes

In article <1992Oct6.132642.12355@Gwinnett.COM>,
todd@Gwinnett.COM (Todd Reese) writes:
> The bombing run was much more distructive than orginal mail.  Five Meg.
> more distructive.

What bombing run?  If thousands of individuals each independently sent
a reasonably short complaint, that could easily add up to 5 Meg, and I
would *not* classify it as a bombing run.  Anyhow, I suspect that the
original mail used more than 5 Meg of storage.

(BTW, I was one of those who sent a reasonably short complaint.)

--apb
Alan Barrett, Dept. of Electronic Eng., Univ. of Natal, Durban, South Africa
RFC822: barrett@ee.und.ac.za                    Bang: m2xenix!undeed!barrett

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1auh4iINNibi@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!tplinfm

References: <1992Oct4.231717.11307@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <bill.718326648@chaos.cs.umn.edu> <1992Oct6.132642.12355@Gwinnett.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!tplinfm
From: barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Alan P Barrett)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,news.admin.misc
Subject: Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email.
Date: 7 Oct 1992 13:19:46 +0200
Organization: Dept. Elec. Eng., Univ. Natal, Durban, S. Africa
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <1auh4iINNibi@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
References: <1992Oct4.231717.11307@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <bill.718326648@chaos.cs.umn.edu> <1992Oct6.132642.12355@Gwinnett.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: daisy.ee.und.ac.za
Keywords: question legal use email

Reply to Parent Message