Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2279Re: When should one use MX records?
From: Ed Anselmo
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 13:59
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 13:59
29 lines
2059 bytes
2059 bytes
>>b: You may have trouble having a CNAME record that makes company.uk an
>> alias for foo.company.uk. I don't think the name server software
>> (at least under SunOS) allows this. However, you can have an
>> additional A record that gives company.uk the same IP address as
>> foo.company.uk. If you order the A records appropriately, the
>> primary name can be foo.company.uk, but mail will still get
>> correctly delivered when addressed to company.uk.
>
>This is also the case for HPUX. A CNAME to create company.uk would hang the
>resolver software. I had to take the approach of creating an A record as
>described above.
Having foo.bar.edu be a CNAME for host.foo.bar.edu is illegal, e.g.
from rfc 1034
The domain system provides such a feature using the canonical name
(CNAME) RR. A CNAME RR identifies its owner name as an alias, and
specifies the corresponding canonical name in the RDATA section of the
RR. If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other data should be
present; this ensures that the data for a canonical name and its aliases
cannot be different. This rule also insures that a cached CNAME can be
used without checking with an authoritative server for other RR types.
So you can't have an NS record for foo.bar.edu along with a CNAME record
for foo.bar.edu which points at host.foo.bar.edu
The options are to make the cannonical name of the host be
foo.bar.edu, with host.foo.bar.edu being a CNAME for foo.bar.edu, or
the additional A records.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1b4380INN4j8@nic.near.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.near.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<BvtG9B.GBo@breeze.rsre.mod.uk> <BvtKy7.4qr@rahul.net> <Bvtt2y.94r@spock.dis.cccd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.near.net!not-for-mail From: anselmo@nic.near.net (Ed Anselmo) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: When should one use MX records? Date: 9 Oct 1992 09:59:28 -0400 Organization: NEARnet, Cambridge, MA Lines: 29 Message-ID: <1b4380INN4j8@nic.near.net> References: <BvtG9B.GBo@breeze.rsre.mod.uk> <BvtKy7.4qr@rahul.net> <Bvtt2y.94r@spock.dis.cccd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: nic.near.net In-reply-to: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu's message of 8 Oct 92 23:25:46 GMT