Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2294Re: When should one use MX records?
From: Christopher Davis
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 05:35
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 05:35
41 lines
2865 bytes
2865 bytes
[this is leaving mail and heading for DNS territory. Watch followups] Tom> == Tom Fitzgerald <fitz@wang.com> RD> == dhesi@rahul.net (Rahul Dhesi) writes: RD> c: Several MX records are often assumed to be more reliable for RD> mail. However, it's not clear to me that they buy you much. RD> Presumably if foo.company.uk is down, mail will remain queued for RD> it at one of the MX hosts. It might as well just remain queued at RD> the sending host. We define two sorts of failures: machinewide and sitewide. Machine wide is level 0 backups, disk reconfigurations, blown ether MAUs, that kind of thing. Sitewide is usually either a power outage or our Internet link going down (the latter mostly). Machinewide failures of our mailhost (eff.org) get mail delivered to the first backup MX, which is on the same ether. Then when we bring the main machine back up, we just /usr/lib/sendmail -v -Reff.org to flush all mail with 'eff.org' in the recipient address. Over the local ether between two SS2s this is quite fast. Much faster than waiting for all those 1 hour (usually) queue runs to come around again. Sitewide failures fall back to our 'last ditch' MXes at the net provider. This is more so that if we're expecting Real Important Mail while we're down, we can arrange to have them flush their queue at us when we return to life than anything else. Tom> For ftp, it seems like there's a growing tradition for having a Tom> CNAME for ftp.company.uk pointing to the ftp server. We do this too. The "service" CNAME is a really useful thing to have; when we added machines, we moved the ftp server to one of the new machines to spread out the load. Folks who used 'ftp.eff.org' were set as soon as the old records timed out where they were; folks who used IP# or "true" hostname lost (there is a redirect message on the old machine still, though). -- Christopher K. Davis | NET.INSIGHTS INTO ARTISTIC CRITICISM: <ckd@eff.org> EFF #14 | ``[Y]ou don't cure bad art by locking it all up System Administrator, EFF | in one museum, you cure it by throwing tomatoes +1 617 864 0665 [CKD1] | at bad artists.'' --Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CKD.92Oct10013531@loiosh.eff.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!ckdReferences:
<BvtG9B.GBo@breeze.rsre.mod.uk> <BvtKy7.4qr@rahul.net> <bvw0j1.1ys@wang.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!ckd From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) Subject: Re: When should one use MX records? In-Reply-To: fitz@wang.com's message of Sat, 10 Oct 92 04:01:48 GMT Message-ID: <CKD.92Oct10013531@loiosh.eff.org> Followup-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster) Nntp-Posting-Host: loiosh.eff.org Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central References: <BvtG9B.GBo@breeze.rsre.mod.uk> <BvtKy7.4qr@rahul.net> <bvw0j1.1ys@wang.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 05:35:35 GMT Lines: 41