Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2342Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email.
From: Hari Seldon psychohistorian
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:37
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:37
42 lines
2715 bytes
2715 bytes
In <Bvz690.2L3@portal.hq.videocart.com> kdenning@portal.hq.videocart.com (Karl Denninger) writes: >In article <p9jprrr@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes: >>wpns@miki.pictel.com (Willie Smith) writes: >>about it. That's just the way the net is. >Lets take a print analogy. PLAYBOY is a legitimate magazine in the US. It >is banned in some Middle-Eastern countries as it displays things which fall >outside their social "AUP". PLAYBOY is not enjoined from PUBLISHING, or even >SENDING the material to those addresses. However, it may be intercepted, >and the intended RECIPIENT may be charged with a crime. Should a copy be >sent to a "restricted" address PLAYBOY is guilty of no offense -- but the >recipient MAY be guilty. dang nab it i didn't know that wasn't allowed? yea right. >So be it with the networks, IMHO. If your network doesn't want some form of >traffic, figure out a way to filter it out and either bounce it back to the >sender or ditch it entirely. I will note that it is almost certainly NOT in so you also are saying that your recpiants wouldn't mind if i mailed the man pages to them and said that you claimed it would be ok. but i'll stop if each of them tells me they don't want it. man am i glad that i don't have you as a provider, i'll bet it'd be hard to bill *you* for my resources used for this kind of crap. ps i'm from in the us. >your best interest to do this -- if you fragment yourself from others you >provide a poorer service to those who connect to and with you, and well how about that. but look it seems to be that only you up there (in the beginning of this post) are the *only* ones defending this position. doesn't that tell ya something?? also i note that ya'll are comercial providers and charge your clients by the volume transmitted. >eventually if that situation persists your customers will either find >another provider (if they can) or will be at an extreme competitive >disadvantage. Such is the realm of reality. bill pociengel -- llbi locgeenpi " i'm a little confused right now"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bill.719023036@chaos.cs.umn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!chaos.cs.umn.edu!billReferences:
<1992Oct9.153359.4787@miki.pictel.com> <p9jprrr@dixie.com> <Bvz690.2L3@portal.hq.videocart.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,news.admin.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!chaos.cs.umn.edu!bill From: bill@chaos.cs.umn.edu ( Hari Seldon psychohistorian ) Subject: Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email. Message-ID: <bill.719023036@chaos.cs.umn.edu> Keywords: question legal use email Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: chaos.cs.umn.edu Organization: University of Minnesota References: <1992Oct9.153359.4787@miki.pictel.com> <p9jprrr@dixie.com> <Bvz690.2L3@portal.hq.videocart.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:37:16 GMT Lines: 42