Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #2366Re: More unsolicited advertising e-mail.
From: Paul Colley
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:10
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:10
45 lines
2696 bytes
2696 bytes
My claim is that junk Email is in exactly the same category as junk cellular calls---the recipient is paying. John seems to have just a little trouble with the idea that I pay for my Email, while he does understand that he pays for his cellular calls. A curious blindspot. The remainder of this posting is a parody, and does not contain new information. In article <0wpp!cj@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes: >pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) writes: > >>Obviously, everybody should start sending bulk junk information to >>John De Armond postage-due. Better yet, if he has a cellular phone, >>somebody local should dial him every hour or so and read the >>classified ads to him, just in case some of it is useful information >>to John. After all, John thinks the recipient should pay the cost >>of receiving electronic junk mail, which classified ads by celluar >>phone certainly qualify as. Electronic junk, that is. > >Innovative concept but you have a couple of small problems to overcome. >I practice what I preach and filter junk mail right at the post office. >Postage-due stuff gets returned. I do have a cell phone but since >making harrassing phone calls to cellular numbers is illegal in >Ga (and maybe nationwide.), things could get very uncomfortable for you. >At the very minimum, it could be considered theft of services. Since >the cellular system bill provides a very nice paper trail, cellular >harrassment is not a good move at all. Innovative concept but you have a couple of small problems to overcome. I practice what I preach and filter junk mail right at the post office. Postage-due stuff gets returned. I do have a Email account but since harrassment is illegal in Ontario (and maybe even in your country or state), things could get very uncomfortable for you. At the very minimum, it could be considered theft of services. Since the system logs provide a very nice audit trail, Email harrassment is not a good move at all. - Paul Colley University: colley@qucis.queensu.ca Home: pacolley@ember.uucp watmath!ember!pacolley +1 613 545 3807 <Ring> [...] "Sorry, I'm all booked up." "Who was that?" "The library." - B.C.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13525@ember.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!ember!pacolleyReferences:
<samp2@dixie.com> <LaoLsB1w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> <13379@ember.UUCP> <0wpp!cj@dixie.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!ember!pacolley From: pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: More unsolicited advertising e-mail. Message-ID: <13525@ember.UUCP> Date: 15 Oct 92 18:10:47 GMT References: <samp2@dixie.com> <LaoLsB1w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> <13379@ember.UUCP> <0wpp!cj@dixie.com> Reply-To: pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) Organization: Ember---private system Lines: 46