Re: Smail 2.5 and SCO Unix 3.2.2

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #2402

#2402

From: Tom Neff
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 05:14

16 lines
1051 bytes

In article <27650187.32DF@tct.uucp> chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>Smail 2.5 with Deliver (much preferred to lmail! :-)) is good enough
>for most UUCP-only sites.

Absolutely!

Smail 2.5, Deliver 2.0, and Mush 6/7 is the perfect combination for a
UUCP leaf site.

However if UUNET would get on the stick with BSMTP, it would be worth
upgrading to Smail3.  We could use a little more ease of installation
there though.

-- 
To have a horror of the bourgeois   (\(    Tom Neff
is bourgeois. -- Jules Renard        )\)   tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <33797300@bfmny0.BFM.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff

References: <1CE00001.e5c4ky@tbomb.ice.com> <1990Dec9.213425.28580@eci386.uucp> <27650187.32DF@tct.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Smail 2.5 and SCO Unix 3.2.2
Message-ID: <33797300@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 12 Dec 90 05:14:38 GMT
References: <1CE00001.e5c4ky@tbomb.ice.com> <1990Dec9.213425.28580@eci386.uucp> <27650187.32DF@tct.uucp>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Followup-To: comp.mail.misc
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message