🚀 go-pugleaf

chip@tct.uucp writes:
   >The real question is whether information is lost.  The answer to that
   >question based on RFC 1123 is NO (there used to be one exception).

   I agree that it is usually possible to determine the original RFC822
   address given only a bang path a la RFC976.  Information loss is not
   the only issue, however.  In the address "bang!path!dom.ain!user", the
   _added_ information ("bang!path") is the problem, because it is very
   often an incomplete, pessimal or unreliable route.

So ignore the bang!path portion.  My users never even see that part,
because of this, in sendmail.cf:

S3
...
#
# Strip many-hop !-paths to the right-most FQDN; DARR.
#
R$*.$*!$*@$*		$1.$2!$3		lose @-portion
R$*!$*.$*!$*		$2.$3!$4		strip excess left-hand
R$*.$*!$*		$3@$1.$2		invert to @-format

This converts bang!path!dom.ain!user to user@dom.ain, that is, it
undoes an RFC976 conversion.

--karl