Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #269Re: Return-view-to:
From: Frank Mayhar
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1989 17:56
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1989 17:56
12 lines
1229 bytes
1229 bytes
Here's an idea: Have the UA inform the MTA that Message-ID such-and-such,
located in file x, needs a Return-view-to processed. The MTA then looks in
the indicated file for that message-id, and if it's there, it generates
the return and marks the message accordingly.
So the UA simply informs the MTA when a particular message has been read
(and contains a return-view-to header), and the MTA actually does the work.
What are the problems with this? Any?
--
Frank Mayhar ..!uunet!ladcgw!frank (frank@ladc.bull.com)
Bull HN Los Angeles Development Center
5250 W. Century Blvd., LA, CA 90045 Phone: (213) 216-6241
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<438@ladcgw.ladc.bull.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ladcgw!frankReferences:
<14552@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <4037@slxsys.specialix.co.uk> <14602@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ladcgw!frank From: frank@ladc.bull.com (Frank Mayhar) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.mush,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Return-view-to: Message-ID: <438@ladcgw.ladc.bull.com> Date: 14 Jun 89 17:56:44 GMT References: <14552@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <4037@slxsys.specialix.co.uk> <14602@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: frank@ladc.bull.com (Frank Mayhar) Followup-To: comp.mail.misc Organization: Bull HN Los Angeles Development Center Lines: 12