Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3229Re: Semantic Difference Between Reply-To and Return-Path?
From: Neil Rickert
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:04
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:04
16 lines
1137 bytes
1137 bytes
In article <1992Nov22.012812.23894@netcom.com> westes@netcom.com (Will Estes) writes: >Can someone explain the semantic difference between the two RFC-822 >headers Reply-To and Return-Path? This is perhaps an over simplification, but: "Return-Path:" is for reports of errors and failures to deliver the message. It identifies the person responsible for sending the message on the network. "From:" identifies the author of the message - the person responsible for the contents of the message. "Reply-To:" is the address for replies related to the contents of the message. In the absence of "Reply-To:", the "From:" header should be used for this purpose.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov22.020402.8232@mp.cs.niu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!rickertReferences:
<1992Nov22.012812.23894@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.headers Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!rickert From: rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) Subject: Re: Semantic Difference Between Reply-To and Return-Path? Message-ID: <1992Nov22.020402.8232@mp.cs.niu.edu> Organization: Northern Illinois University References: <1992Nov22.012812.23894@netcom.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:04:02 GMT Lines: 17