Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3348Re: Mixed format addresses
From: Zbigniew J. Tyrlik
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 17:07
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 17:07
70 lines
3509 bytes
3509 bytes
As quoted from <TkJPVB1w165w@willard.UUCP> by dawson@willard.UUCP: +--------------- > I can envision scenarios, for example, given present growth on the Internet, > and AROUND it as well, where queries to DNS could exceed present day software's > capabilities, in much the same way as the events that would occur if ~everyone~ > tried to call you on the telephone at once. What would happen? Have you given > any thought about what would happen to your DNS system if ALL of the Internet > attempted to query it, simultaneously? > You forgot about secondary nameservers, and the fact that usually all editions of named do cache adresses... The only one case of it will be if if all machines will come up at once, and all will want to send you mail at once... > > Which one is easier to update? (DNS) > > Easier for whom to update? You (who are on the Internet)? Those whose > only connection is by UUCP? Why can we not have a system that is easy Either you do not understand DNS, or are simply joking. For a site which is uucp only connected, and has a FQDN, it is enough to set it once forever... done. For a Internet based site, it is easier for me to update my own edition of DNS, and from this monet every quesry will get updated version. With pathalias - propagation time of maps is quite long, and we have had multiple occurences of maps going to /dev/null. Claiming that updating maps is easier is funny. > > What tells me that DNS is not so reliable as at first it might appear are > the example of incorrect routing I've seen... bounced email with "no such > host" or "no such domain" when it was damn well true that the domain or > host did exist, as did nameservers for them. Mostly, these examples are > drawn from attempts to reply to email. Usually it comes to the point that site unable to respond was configured totally wrong... like only local nameservers... > of whether the idea of using a database that is accessible to more than > just the privileged few who happen to be ON the Internet is a good, or ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ you must be kidding, man ... priviledged few on Internet... Are you aware that number of hosts on Internet is a magnitute bigger that hosts with uucp only connections ??? > -- > dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson) > gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson > emory!uumind!willard!dawson > Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814 Sorry, Willard - your bias against Internet is quite interesting... _zjt -- ******************************************************************** Zbigniew J. Tyrlik DoD# 0759 VF700C '84 zbig@wariat.org IBM PC SIG Sysop - Cleveland Free-Net aa609@cleveland.freenet.edu APK Public Access UNI* Cleveland, (216)-481-9436 Feeds, shell, FTP & telnet access Uniboard distribution point ********************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec13.170721.2862@wariat.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!zbigReferences:
<6#81H#ikbb@atlantis.psu.edu> <TkJPVB1w165w@willard.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!zbig From: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses Message-ID: <1992Dec13.170721.2862@wariat.org> Followup-To: comp.mail.misc Reply-To: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Public Access Uni* Site References: <6#81H#ikbb@atlantis.psu.edu> <TkJPVB1w165w@willard.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 17:07:21 GMT Lines: 70