Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3370Re: Mixed format addresses
From: Bill Fenner
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:10
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:10
17 lines
1321 bytes
1321 bytes
In article <0HVRVB5w165w@willard.UUCP> dawson@willard.UUCP writes: |I propose that a solution to routing mail could be arrived at that has |a higher degree of success than is currently the case with either DNS |or pathalias routing alone. Please do. If you come up with any concrete ideas, please share them with us. The current discussion seems to have degenerated into a religious war, and, as such, I won't be participating any more. (Plus, Chris Davis and David Barr always make my points anyway... =) A solution like "Have a forwarder to send unknown addresses to" is prone to serious configuration errors - what happens if two people configure each other as their unknown-host forwarder? Don't just brush this off as a configuration problem; your main complaints with the DNS seem to be caused by configuration problems. Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bz9Mpw.948@cs.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!snobol.cs.psu.edu!fennerReferences:
<1992Dec13.170721.2862@wariat.org> <0HVRVB5w165w@willard.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!snobol.cs.psu.edu!fenner From: fenner@snobol.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses Message-ID: <Bz9Mpw.948@cs.psu.edu> Date: 14 Dec 92 20:10:43 GMT References: <1992Dec13.170721.2862@wariat.org> <0HVRVB5w165w@willard.UUCP> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 17 Nntp-Posting-Host: snobol.cs.psu.edu