Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3388Re: Mixed format addresses
From: Karl_Kleinpaste
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:59
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:59
40 lines
2700 bytes
2700 bytes
stanley@skyking.oce.orst.edu writes: >Then my boss isn't really in charge of the machines at my site, because he >has to go through one of the sysadmins to make a configuration change? There is a bit of a difference between your boss, who is in charge of the system admins who make the changes, and me, who is in charge of nobody at the site who maintains my DNS records. Unless you think that having someone keep an MX record for you somehow makes you in charge of the person doing it. Your attitude is insulting to the many sysadmins out there who voluntarily support domains requiring MX support. I used to have an open offer to provide nameservice and MX connectivity to absolutely any entity anywhere, when I was [ph]ostmaster@cis.ohio-state.edu. Anyone who ran such a domain and needed updates simply mailed me the update, and I didn't do anything more than check it quickly for outright errors so my nameservers wouldn't choke on it. Installation of the updates was usually done within the day. It is singularly inappropriate for you to be accusing others of taking the low road of personal insult when you are quite possibly doing more of the same, obtusely and without direct reference, than the rest of the participants in this pointless argument combined. Yes, when you are the domain contact of an MX-supported domain, you _are_ in charge of the zone file for your domain, and the sysadmin who actually manages the nameservers that support your domain has a quite obvious and clear responsibility to be responsive to your needs for updates. If they weren't prepared for that responsibility, they wouldn't have offered to be provide nameservice. If you're going to be insulting, you could at least have the common decency to provide counterexamples, situations where nameserver admins have deliberately, or even unknowingly, made life difficult for MX-supported domains by _not_ being responsive to such needs. --karl, at one time, technical and zone contact for some 40 domains, most of which I registered myself
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzBBMJ.4xp.2@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!cs.cmu.edu!Karl_KleinpasteReferences:
<1gjj5oINN9ll@gaia.ucs.orst.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!cs.cmu.edu!Karl_Kleinpaste From: Karl_Kleinpaste@cs.cmu.edu Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses Message-ID: <BzBBMJ.4xp.2@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 15 Dec 92 17:59:02 GMT Article-I.D.: cs.BzBBMJ.4xp.2 References: <1gjj5oINN9ll@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System) Organization: Carnegie-Mellon Univ, Nectar Project Lines: 40 Nntp-Posting-Host: godiva.nectar.cs.cmu.edu