Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3519Re: BITFTP grief!
From: Leslie Mikesell
Date: Tue, 21 May 1991 02:50
Date: Tue, 21 May 1991 02:50
17 lines
1229 bytes
1229 bytes
In article <1991May20.180914.26084@chinacat.unicom.com> chip@chinacat.unicom.com (Chip Rosenthal) writes: > [900 blocking] >Therefore, there are folks out there willing to pay for a call to uunet >to grab stuff who can't. Maybe not on the spur of the moment, but they can always get a subscription and the associated access through direct LD, 800 numbers, telenet, Compuserve's network, and whatever else they happen to use. >But that's still all beside the point - I don't >think that justifies BITFTP or mail servers. Why - do you think mail should only be delivered when it suits the carrier's whims? Les Mikesell les@chinet.chi.il.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May21.025032.25282@chinet.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!clout!chinet!lesReferences:
<1991May19.133104.11572@balkan.TNT.COM> <1991May19.194044.24840@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1991May20.180914.26084@chinacat.unicom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!clout!chinet!les From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp,news.admin Subject: Re: BITFTP grief! Message-ID: <1991May21.025032.25282@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 21 May 91 02:50:32 GMT References: <1991May19.133104.11572@balkan.TNT.COM> <1991May19.194044.24840@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1991May20.180914.26084@chinacat.unicom.com> Distribution: na Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX Lines: 17