Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3750RE: Internet Draft on Multimedia, Multipart Mail
From: David Summers
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1991 07:06
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1991 07:06
23 lines
1440 bytes
1440 bytes
Hopefully this belongs in all of these groups... What chances are there of SMAIL 3.1.21, MUSH 7.2.3, and ELM 2.3.11 supporting this (new?) "standard"? How easy would it be to make changes for this? What changes would be necessary? I'm really excited by this and in a way am kind of confused as to why it has taken so long (???) to come up with a binary "standard" for e-mail? It SOUNDS like it wouldn't be too hard to make changes to support this. Am I being naive? I haven't even looked at the code for these programs yet (very much). Also: What about UseNet/NetNews? Could this also apply to that? Let's have some discussion! :-) - David Summers (david@actsn.fay.ar.us) -- I'm sick and tired of this machine, I wish that I could sell it. It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it! - David Summers (david@actsn.fay.ar.us)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<335@actsn.fay.ar.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!ns-mx!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!uafhp!actsn!davidShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!ns-mx!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!uafhp!actsn!david From: david@actsn.fay.ar.us (David Summers) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.elm,comp.mail.mush,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.headers Subject: RE: Internet Draft on Multimedia, Multipart Mail Keywords: IEF IETF RFC Mail RFC-822 Extension Message-ID: <335@actsn.fay.ar.us> Date: 23 Jun 91 07:06:08 GMT Followup-To: comp.mail.misc Organization: All Church Technical Service, Fayetteville, AR Lines: 23