Re: Is SysVr4 mail usable?

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #3792

#3792

From: Tony L. Hansen
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 02:23

12 lines
1146 bytes

< I will soon be upgrading a group of SysVr3 machines to SysVr4. Should I
< consider using the native mailer instead of replacing it with Smail3
< which I am using now?  I need good alias, forwarding and list file
< handling.  It looks like the SysVr4 mailer will do some of this, but
< can it match Smail at recursing through the aliases, forwards and lists
< until everything is resolved and the duplicates discarded?

I believe that the SVr4 mail system can do everything that smail can do.

					Tony Hansen
			    hansen@pegasus.att.com, tony@attmail.com
				att!pegasus!hansen, attmail!tony

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jun27.022340.15573@cbnewsk.att.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!tridom!atssc!fang!att!cbnewsk!pegasus!hansen

References: <1991Jun19.195918.23496@chinet.chi.il.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!tridom!atssc!fang!att!cbnewsk!pegasus!hansen
From: hansen@pegasus.att.com (Tony L. Hansen)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Is SysVr4 mail usable?
Summary: yes, it is usable
Keywords: mail, SVr4
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.022340.15573@cbnewsk.att.com>
Date: 27 Jun 91 02:23:40 GMT
References: <1991Jun19.195918.23496@chinet.chi.il.us>
Sender: hansen@cbnewsk.att.com (tony.l.hansen)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message