🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #3879

Re: (not an) RFC: mailbox format

#3879
From: Marc VanHeyningen
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:54
14 lines
1178 bytes
Thus said stanley@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (John Stanley):
>Is there any good reason why MIME chose to go with its own version of
>binary encoding instead of using UUENCODE?
>
>While there are some systems that can't pass UUENCODEd data (converting
>one ASCII character to something else, as I recall), UUENCODE IS almost
>universally available, while MIME is not. 

This is exactly why.  It doesn't do much good for the recipient to
have uudecode available if the data was munged somewhere along the
way.  By the way, MIME didn't invent base64 encoding out of thin air,
but borrowed it from the PEM RFCs.

Followups set to comp.mail.mime.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.115416.29196@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!mvanheyn@raisin.ucs.indiana.edu
References: <MS-C.727914241.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> <1k0u3kINNq3v@gaia.ucs.orst.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!mvanheyn@raisin.ucs.indiana.edu
From: mvanheyn@whale.cs.indiana.edu (Marc VanHeyningen)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.mime
Subject: Re: (not an) RFC: mailbox format
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.115416.29196@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 25 Jan 93 16:54:07 GMT
References: <MS-C.727914241.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> <1k0u3kINNq3v@gaia.ucs.orst.edu>
Followup-To: comp.mail.mime
Organization: Computer Science Dept, Indiana University
Lines: 14
X-Quoted: 42%