Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #388Re: Replying to mail... is there a general theory?
From: Jos Vos
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 11:08
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 11:08
20 lines
1287 bytes
1287 bytes
In article <1581@marvin.Solbourne.COM> dce@Solbourne.com (David Elliott) writes: >In article <207@unmvax.unm.edu> mike@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Michael I. Bushnell) writes: >>Actually, you should use, in order of preference, the following: >> Reply-To: >> From: >> Sender: >What about Return-Path:? I modified my MH configuration files >to prefer that because it seems to be right more of the time >than any of the others. The From: field *should* contain an absolute domain address (in the ideal situation) in its whole life (i.e. already on the sender's system). In that case nobody has (and *may*) change this field. -- -- ###### Jos Vos ###### Internet jos@idca.tds.philips.nl ###### -- ###### ###### UUCP ...!mcvax!philapd!jos ######
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1140@ssp15.idca.tds.philips.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!philapd!ssp15!josReferences:
<3483@portia.Stanford.EDU> <207@unmvax.unm.edu> <1581@marvin.Solbourne.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!philapd!ssp15!jos From: jos@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Jos Vos) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Replying to mail... is there a general theory? Message-ID: <1140@ssp15.idca.tds.philips.nl> Date: 12 Jul 89 11:08:26 GMT References: <3483@portia.Stanford.EDU> <207@unmvax.unm.edu> <1581@marvin.Solbourne.COM> Organization: Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems, The Netherlands Lines: 20