Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #4397Re: Mush vs. Elm vs. MH vs. ...
From: Bill Gunshannon
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1987 13:09
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1987 13:09
24 lines
1731 bytes
1731 bytes
In article <905@bdmrrr.bdm.com>, shprentz@bdmrrr.bdm.com (Joel Shprentz) writes:
> Can anyone comment on how Mush, the mail user's shell just posted to
> comp.sources.unix, compares with Elm or MH?
>
I can't comment on MUSH yet because I am missing parts 7-12 but I can tell
you that although ELM works fine on the 3B2 that I am writting this on it
does have some problems. I have been trying for some months now to get it
run on an INTEL 310 without success. Don't get me wrong, it isn't ELM's
fault, the compiler on the INTEL is a disaster. It is also inconsistent.
It has some of the system calls for SYSV and some for V7. Makes for some
interesting programming.
MH is a new one to me but if someone can send me the sources I would be
willing to give it a try too. Almost anything is better than vanilla mail.
bill gunshannon
UUCP: {philabs}\ US SNAIL: Martin Marietta Data Systems
{phri } >!trotter.usma.edu!bill USMA, Bldg 600, Room 26
{sunybcs}/ West Point, NY 10996
RADIO: KB3YV PHONE: WORK (914)446-7747
AX.25: KB3YV @ K3RLI PHONE: HOME (914)565-5256
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<926@trotter.usma.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!sunybcs!trotter!billReferences:
<905@bdmrrr.bdm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!sunybcs!trotter!bill From: bill@trotter.usma.edu (Bill Gunshannon) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Mush vs. Elm vs. MH vs. ... Message-ID: <926@trotter.usma.edu> Date: Fri, 25-Sep-87 09:09:01 EDT Article-I.D.: trotter.926 Posted: Fri Sep 25 09:09:01 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Sep-87 20:15:50 EDT References: <905@bdmrrr.bdm.com> Organization: US Military Academy, West Point, NY Lines: 24 Keywords: Which is best?