🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <448@fig.bbn.com> rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>I get lots of those stupid !@#$ BITNET failure messages, lately it seems
>I'm guaranteed to get at least one for each comp.sources.unix article I
>put out.  I have found that the only thing that works is to send a sharp
>message, full of lots of SHOUTING CAPITALS to {postmaster,listserv,rscs}@
>{every-host-mentioned-in-a-header} with all the mail messages appended.

Gee, I never thought I'd have to flame Rich Salz, failthful moderator
of far too many groups to count, but here goes:

How about sending a message to POSTMAST@UWAVM.BITNET before
complaining to the whole net, Rich? You'll notice that the messages
you're complaining about all come from RSCS@UWAVM -- why not start
with the source of the problem?

>If anyone knows of a better place to complain about this kind of stuff,
>I'd like to hear about it ASAP; isn't there a BITNET engineering task
>meeting this week?  (I wish I could avoid the tendency to claim that's
>on oxymoron. :-)

See above.

>	/rich $alz, moderator of comp.sources.unix



-- 
David Boyes         | ARPA: 556%OREGON1.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Systems Division    | BITNET: 556@OREGON1
UO Computing Center | UUCP: dboyes@uoregon.UUCP
'How long d'ya think it'll be before just us oldtimers remember WISCVM?'