🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7385@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> karl@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste) writes:

>(And as an aside, my note was not "lots of whining," as claimed.  I
>merely posted that I had gotten a strange note which I could not
>correlate with anything I'd written, couldn't get any direct help when
>I went through the standard procedure for asking for help, and hence
>posted here looking for network wisdom.  I can't think of a better
>approach to the problem.  I'm open to new suggestions, though.)

Sorry about that, Karl. I was in a filthy mood -- realize that for
every one of those messages you got, I got THREE. One as postmaster,
one as mailing list server maintainer, and one as mail daemon
maintainer -- which adds up to 11,268 messages. All because someone
at another site took the easy way out and used TRANSFER instead of SPTAPE...

>You have no hope whatever of making the system imposter-proof so long
>as you maintain connections with networks that openly and freely
>acknowledge that they are not secure, including but not limited to
>UUCP and the Internet.

Good point. I was thinking primarily of mail originating within
BITNET, but your comment is correct. 

>Karl


-- 
David Boyes         | ARPA: 556%OREGON1.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Systems Division    | BITNET: 556@OREGON1
UO Computing Center | UUCP: dboyes@uoregon.UUCP
'How long d'ya think it'll be before just us oldtimers remember WISCVM?'