Article View: comp.mail.misc
Article #4787Re: I do *NOT* forward AT&T Mail messages (AT&T mail is a premium service)
From: Leslie Mikesell
Date: Thu, 12 May 1988 17:39
Date: Thu, 12 May 1988 17:39
14 lines
1207 bytes
1207 bytes
In article <4369@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> barnett@steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett) writes: >... >attmail icus(DEMAND) # AT&T Mail calls on demand >If this is a pay service, I suggest you don't advertise to the world >such a connection. You should have a private and public map. But the maps only control what the automatic routers will do. There would still be nothing to prevent neighoring sites from using bang paths to force the routing (not to imply that anyone would do such a thing). This problem is likely to become serious as more commercial services are available for uucp connections. Does sendmail allow forwarding rules to depend on the sender? Les Mikesell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5575@chinet.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ihnp4!chinet!lesReferences:
<356@icus.UUCP> <4369@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ihnp4!chinet!les From: les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp,news.sysadmin Subject: Re: I do *NOT* forward AT&T Mail messages (AT&T mail is a premium service) Keywords: attmail, mail, email, $$$, money Message-ID: <5575@chinet.UUCP> Date: 12 May 88 17:39:35 GMT References: <356@icus.UUCP> <4369@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> Reply-To: les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix Lines: 14