Re: Another example why not to re-route

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #5036

#5036

From: Gregory M. Paris
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1988 03:03

18 lines
1414 bytes

In an article vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A Vixie) writes:
> In various past articles I have answered this.  Basically, you should NOT

Long ago I put Mr. Vixie in my KILL file for comp.mail.uucp because he
seems to post incessantly on this one topic:  Do not reroute.  I'm not
sure how many times we have to suffer the diatribe, but now I see it's
begun to infect this group too.

Please folks, if you want to argue this until the cows come home, feel
free, but please do it in the appropriate group, comp.mail.uucp.  Even
better, create a new group, talk.reroute, and bash each other there.

Thank you.  Now to add to my KILL file...

-- 
Greg Paris                     <gmp@rayssd.ray.com>
{decuac,garp,gatech,necntc,spdcc,sun,uiucdcs,ukma}!rayssd!gmp
I find your lack of faith disturbing.  [Lord Vader]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5050@rayssd.ray.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!ima!spdcc!rayssd!gmp

References: <352@lakart.UUCP> <VIXIE.88Nov29223051@bacchus.pa.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!ima!spdcc!rayssd!gmp
From: gmp@rayssd.ray.com (Gregory M. Paris)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Another example why not to re-route
Summary: Give it up or stay in comp.mail.uucp please.
Message-ID: <5050@rayssd.ray.com>
Date: 1 Dec 88 03:03:41 GMT
References: <352@lakart.UUCP> <VIXIE.88Nov29223051@bacchus.pa.dec.com>
Sender: gmp@rayssd.ray.com (Gregory M. Paris @ Raytheon Company, Portsmouth RI)
Reply-To: gmp@rayssd.RAY.COM (Gregory M. Paris)
Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: Raytheon Submarine Signal Division
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message