Re: Is this a valid Date: header?

Article View: comp.mail.misc

Article #5551

#5551

From: Doug Eastick
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1990 03:41

10 lines
701 bytes

dce@smsc.sony.com (David Elliott) writes:
>	Date: 02/23/1990  13:12:23

For days less than 13, zz/xx/yy is ambiguous; is zz the day? or
xx the day?  Unparseable.  One of the RFC's sets the format(s) allowed
(RFC-822?).

...as he waits for henry@utzoo to answer...
--
Doug Eastick -- eastick@me.utoronto.ca

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Feb23.224119.29516@me.toronto.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!me!eastick

References: <1990Feb23.211856.5892@smsc.sony.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!me!eastick
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: eastick@me.utoronto.ca (Doug Eastick)
Subject: Re: Is this a valid Date: header?
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.224119.29516@me.toronto.edu>
Copyright: none
Organisation: U of Toronto, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
References: <1990Feb23.211856.5892@smsc.sony.com>
Date: 24 Feb 90 03:41:20 GMT

Reply to Parent Message